naca-tn-2963

  • Version
  • 152 Downloads
  • 530.82 KB File Size
  • 1 File Count
  • January 20, 2017 Create Date
  • January 20, 2017 Last Updated
Scroll for Details

National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Technical Notes - Effect of Variation in Rivet Strength on the Average Stress at Maximum Load for Aluminum Alloy, Flat, Z-Stiffened Compression Panels that Fail by Local Buckling

A study is made of the effect of variation in rivet strength on the
average panel stress at maximum load for 75S-T6 aluminum-alloy, flat,
Z-stiffened compression panels that fail by local buckling. A curve is
presented for the determination of the relationship between strength,
diameter, and pitch of the rivets, and the strength of stiffened, flat
compression panels of such proportions that failure is by local buckling.

The effect on the strength of longitudinally stiffened compression
panels of the riveting used to attach stiffeners to skin has been exten-
sively investigated at the Langley structures research laboratory of the
National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics. Comprehensive test data
have been presented on the strength of Bus-T3 aluminum—alloy panels
assembled with Al7S-Th aluminum-alloy rivets at various combinations of
rivet pitch and diameter (refs. 1 to 5), and the test program has been
extended (ref. 6) to include YES—T6 aluminum-alloy panels of similar
dimensions. Reference 6 presents a curve for the determination of the
stress at maximum load for aluminum—alloy panels, having extruded,
Z—section stiffeners attached to the skin with Al7S-TA aluminum-alloy
rivets at various combinations of rivet diameter and pitch.

The phase of the investigation reported herein is an extension of
the previous work to include the effect of rivet strength, in addition
to size and spacing, and thereby to adapt the previous data for use with
rivets of any kind.

All the test specimens were 758-T6 aluminum-alloy panels having
longitudinal, extruded, Z—section stiffeners and the dimensions shown
in figure 1. The length of the panels (L/p = 20) was chosen to avoid
column-bending type of failures. The test panels were assembled with
universal head (ANkYO) or Cherry blind type (ANh63) rivets and seven
different rivet materials were investigated. The rivet materials used
were 28, 538, A178, and 2#S aluminum alloys, FS—l magnesium alloy,
beryllium-copper, and Mbnel metal. The Cherry blind rivets had Al7S-Th
shanks and lYS—Th mandrils. Rivet diameters and pitches were varied as
in previous investigations (refs. 1 to 6).

FileAction
naca-tn-2963 Effect of Variation in Rivet Strength on the Average Stress at Maximum Load for Aluminum Alloy, Flat,.pdfDownload 

Comment On This Post

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

naca-tn-2963

  • Version
  • 152 Downloads
  • 530.82 KB File Size
  • 1 File Count
  • January 20, 2017 Create Date
  • January 20, 2017 Last Updated
Scroll for Details

National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Technical Notes - Effect of Variation in Rivet Strength on the Average Stress at Maximum Load for Aluminum Alloy, Flat, Z-Stiffened Compression Panels that Fail by Local Buckling

A study is made of the effect of variation in rivet strength on the
average panel stress at maximum load for 75S-T6 aluminum-alloy, flat,
Z-stiffened compression panels that fail by local buckling. A curve is
presented for the determination of the relationship between strength,
diameter, and pitch of the rivets, and the strength of stiffened, flat
compression panels of such proportions that failure is by local buckling.

The effect on the strength of longitudinally stiffened compression
panels of the riveting used to attach stiffeners to skin has been exten-
sively investigated at the Langley structures research laboratory of the
National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics. Comprehensive test data
have been presented on the strength of Bus-T3 aluminum—alloy panels
assembled with Al7S-Th aluminum-alloy rivets at various combinations of
rivet pitch and diameter (refs. 1 to 5), and the test program has been
extended (ref. 6) to include YES—T6 aluminum-alloy panels of similar
dimensions. Reference 6 presents a curve for the determination of the
stress at maximum load for aluminum—alloy panels, having extruded,
Z—section stiffeners attached to the skin with Al7S-TA aluminum-alloy
rivets at various combinations of rivet diameter and pitch.

The phase of the investigation reported herein is an extension of
the previous work to include the effect of rivet strength, in addition
to size and spacing, and thereby to adapt the previous data for use with
rivets of any kind.

All the test specimens were 758-T6 aluminum-alloy panels having
longitudinal, extruded, Z—section stiffeners and the dimensions shown
in figure 1. The length of the panels (L/p = 20) was chosen to avoid
column-bending type of failures. The test panels were assembled with
universal head (ANkYO) or Cherry blind type (ANh63) rivets and seven
different rivet materials were investigated. The rivet materials used
were 28, 538, A178, and 2#S aluminum alloys, FS—l magnesium alloy,
beryllium-copper, and Mbnel metal. The Cherry blind rivets had Al7S-Th
shanks and lYS—Th mandrils. Rivet diameters and pitches were varied as
in previous investigations (refs. 1 to 6).

FileAction
naca-tn-2963 Effect of Variation in Rivet Strength on the Average Stress at Maximum Load for Aluminum Alloy, Flat,.pdfDownload 
17,005 Documents in our Technical Library
2670624 Total Downloads

Search The Technical Library

Newest Additions

NASA-RP-1060 Subsonic Aircraft: Evolution and the Matching of Size to Performance
NASA-RP-1060 Subsonic Aircraft: Evolution and the Matching of Size to Performance
AA-CP-20212-001
AA-CP-20212-001
ADPO10769 Occurrence of Corrosion in Airframes
The purpose of this lecture is to provide an overview ...
MIL-STD-1759 Rivets and Rivet Type Fasteners Preferred for Design
The purpose of this book form standard is to provide ...
MIL-STD-810G Environmental Engineering Considerations and Laboratory Tests
This standard contains materiel acquisition program planning and engineering direction ...