17,005 Documents in our Technical Library
2727422 Total Downloads

Newest Additions

NASA-RP-1060 Subsonic Aircraft: Evolution and the Matching of Size to Performance
NASA-RP-1060 Subsonic Aircraft: Evolution and the Matching of Size to Performance
AA-CP-20212-001
AA-CP-20212-001
ADPO10769 Occurrence of Corrosion in Airframes
The purpose of this lecture is to provide an overview ...
MIL-STD-1759 Rivets and Rivet Type Fasteners Preferred for Design
The purpose of this book form standard is to provide ...
MIL-STD-810G Environmental Engineering Considerations and Laboratory Tests
This standard contains materiel acquisition program planning and engineering direction ...

ATSB-B2004-0337

ATSB-B2004-0337
  • Version
  • 168 Downloads
  • 564.02 KB File Size
  • 1 File Count
  • August 9, 2016 Create Date
  • August 9, 2016 Last Updated
Scroll for Details

Risks Associated with Aerial Campaign Management; Lessons from a Case Study of Aerial Locust Control

ATSB-B2004-0337 Risks Associated with Aerial Campaign Management; Lessons from a Case Study of Aerial Locust Control

In 2004, there were two wirestrike accidents in New South Wales involving
helicopters undertaking locust control operations. The first accident occurred
in October 2004 near Forbes and resulted in minor injuries to one occupant
and extensive damage to the helicopter. The second accident occurred in
November 2004 near Dunedoo and resulted in the death of two occupants. A
third occupant was seriously injured and there was extensive damage to the
helicopter. A third accident, near Mudgee in November 2004, involved a
helicopter that was being used for locust control, although the helicopter was
not involved in locust control activities at the time of the accident.

The Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) began formal investigations
into all three accidents and a research investigation into the practices used by
Government organisations to contract aerial operators for locust control in
order to identify issues that may enhance future aviation safety.

Locust control operations are presented as a case study, but it is intended that
organisations managing other aerial operations with similarities to locust
control, such as aerial fire control, other pest management operations, and
emergency service operations, may also find the concepts presented in this
analysis useful. These types of operations, collectively referred to in the
report as ‘aerial campaigns’, are characterised by:

- a significant community need for the operation, possibly urgent;

- requiring the coordination of significant numbers of resources and
organisations;

- a degree of irregularity or unpredictability as to when the operation
Will be required and the size the operation;

- requiring aerial operations with a relatively high hazard level; and

- a regularly changing operational environment throughout the course
of the campaign.

These characteristics potentially increase risk to the organisation and its staff.
Locust control organisations are closely involved in aerial operations and can
therefore influence the level of risk of the operations.

Many complex organisations operating in a hazardous environment, such as
major public air transport companies, recognise the influence they have on
safety. While they may subcontract many safety-critical aspects of their
operations, these organisations still maintain an interest in the safety of these
operations and proactively manage safety beyond What is required by
regulation. Similar methods can be effective for mitigating risk in aerial
campaigns.

FileAction
ATSB-B2004-0337 Risks Associated with Aerial Campaign Management; Lessons from a Case Study of Aerial Locust Control.pdfDownload 

Comment On This Post

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

ATSB-B2004-0337

ATSB-B2004-0337
  • Version
  • 168 Downloads
  • 564.02 KB File Size
  • 1 File Count
  • August 9, 2016 Create Date
  • August 9, 2016 Last Updated
Scroll for Details

Risks Associated with Aerial Campaign Management; Lessons from a Case Study of Aerial Locust Control

ATSB-B2004-0337 Risks Associated with Aerial Campaign Management; Lessons from a Case Study of Aerial Locust Control

In 2004, there were two wirestrike accidents in New South Wales involving
helicopters undertaking locust control operations. The first accident occurred
in October 2004 near Forbes and resulted in minor injuries to one occupant
and extensive damage to the helicopter. The second accident occurred in
November 2004 near Dunedoo and resulted in the death of two occupants. A
third occupant was seriously injured and there was extensive damage to the
helicopter. A third accident, near Mudgee in November 2004, involved a
helicopter that was being used for locust control, although the helicopter was
not involved in locust control activities at the time of the accident.

The Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) began formal investigations
into all three accidents and a research investigation into the practices used by
Government organisations to contract aerial operators for locust control in
order to identify issues that may enhance future aviation safety.

Locust control operations are presented as a case study, but it is intended that
organisations managing other aerial operations with similarities to locust
control, such as aerial fire control, other pest management operations, and
emergency service operations, may also find the concepts presented in this
analysis useful. These types of operations, collectively referred to in the
report as ‘aerial campaigns’, are characterised by:

- a significant community need for the operation, possibly urgent;

- requiring the coordination of significant numbers of resources and
organisations;

- a degree of irregularity or unpredictability as to when the operation
Will be required and the size the operation;

- requiring aerial operations with a relatively high hazard level; and

- a regularly changing operational environment throughout the course
of the campaign.

These characteristics potentially increase risk to the organisation and its staff.
Locust control organisations are closely involved in aerial operations and can
therefore influence the level of risk of the operations.

Many complex organisations operating in a hazardous environment, such as
major public air transport companies, recognise the influence they have on
safety. While they may subcontract many safety-critical aspects of their
operations, these organisations still maintain an interest in the safety of these
operations and proactively manage safety beyond What is required by
regulation. Similar methods can be effective for mitigating risk in aerial
campaigns.

FileAction
ATSB-B2004-0337 Risks Associated with Aerial Campaign Management; Lessons from a Case Study of Aerial Locust Control.pdfDownload 
17,005 Documents in our Technical Library
2727422 Total Downloads

Search The Technical Library

Newest Additions

NASA-RP-1060 Subsonic Aircraft: Evolution and the Matching of Size to Performance
NASA-RP-1060 Subsonic Aircraft: Evolution and the Matching of Size to Performance
AA-CP-20212-001
AA-CP-20212-001
ADPO10769 Occurrence of Corrosion in Airframes
The purpose of this lecture is to provide an overview ...
MIL-STD-1759 Rivets and Rivet Type Fasteners Preferred for Design
The purpose of this book form standard is to provide ...
MIL-STD-810G Environmental Engineering Considerations and Laboratory Tests
This standard contains materiel acquisition program planning and engineering direction ...